HPSAI Transformation

Product dossier — Lane 03 · Production operations

Contact Center AI

AI is operating inside member service today. The current expansion moves from claims and benefits assistance into quality, after-call work, and additional service lines. The documented target keeps a person responsible for the customer-facing decision.

Operating Current position · August 5, 2026
Operating proof
Five call types are recorded on the AI contact-center path. The January 2026 business case states a late-2025 production stack; specific workload milestones are not independently validated here.
Claims expansion
Readiness remains scheduled for the end of August; Operations testing and an approval cycle forecast beyond four weeks control the timing.
Platform decision
Benefits and enrollment scope is held pending the Cisco WebEx or AWS contact-center platform direction.
Quality expansion
VOC discovery is active with an October 2026 phase target; process impact and discovery outcomes remain the controlling dependency.

Status lines load from the latest reviewed portfolio register. Targets remain planning targets, not delivery commitments.

Documented service architecture

Private AI is designed to remain behind the human service decision.

The documented path begins with an approved channel. Identity and consent scope the work before the private runtime retrieves source-backed context and proposes a response. A service representative retains the decision to resolve, edit, or escalate before anything is written back.

01 · Member request Approved channel

Voice or authenticated service entry starts a bounded interaction.

02–04 · Protected runtime Context becomes a cited recommendation.
  1. Identity + consentSet the permitted member and service context.
  2. Retrieve + citeGround the response in approved policies, plans, and scripts.
  3. Policy + confidenceSuppress sensitive, unsupported, or low-confidence output.
05 · Human authority Resolve, edit, or escalate.

The service representative controls the customer-facing response.

06 · Service record Write back with evidence.

Approved disposition, CRM update, escalation, and quality record stay connected.

Operating record

The January 2026 business case records five call types on the AI service path, alongside late-2025 production-stack figures of 3.6 million interactions and 99.99% uptime.

The stack figures are context, not independently validated Contact Center AI performance indicators.

Current expansion

The next service capability moves only when its dependency closes.

Current position · August 5, 2026

Claims is the immediate expansion. Platform selection, Operations approval, discovery, and model-quality evidence determine what follows. Current expansion status is sourced from the latest reviewed register; targets remain planning targets.

Loading the current member-service expansion view…

Every line loads from the latest reviewed register. Dates are source-record dates; targets remain planning targets, not delivery commitments.

Documented target architecture

The private runtime remains behind identity, policy, and human approval.

The documented design normalizes voice, chat, secure messages, and portal events into one service event, scopes retrieval through identity and consent, routes through a replaceable model layer with citations and policy controls, and reserves CRM writeback for agent approval.

01 · Omnichannel intake 02 · Channel adapters 03 · Private AI runtime 04 · Data & integration Voice / IVR Web chat Secure message Email / SMS handoff Portal events ServiceLink · BrokerLink GroupLink Contact center routing queue · skill · language Identity & consent data scope set before retrieval Channel adapter one service event per interaction Channel integration telephony · chat · message · portal API gateway authenticated service calls Model gateway private runtime · replaceable models RAG retrieval source-backed answers · citations Compliance guardrails PII/PHI policy · confidence gates CRM & case platform agent-approved writeback only Document repositories policies · plans · scripts Mainframe DB2 behind the coexistence facade core service APIs · eligibility · claims · documents 05 · Security perimeter Zero trust Network security Compliance monitoring
Redrawn from the documented L1 omnichannel target view in the July 2026 program record. The design normalizes an interaction to one service event, scopes retrieval through identity and consent, routes through a model gateway with citations and policy controls, and reserves CRM writeback for agent approval. The documented security perimeter spans every zone. Scroll horizontally on narrow screens.

Harness-tested target controls

Unsafe conditions are designed to fail closed.

The sandbox service harness exercises target responses for incomplete identity, low confidence, source mismatch, and privacy-policy hits. The expected action is to suppress automation, preserve the test evidence, and route the work to a person; staged writeback is not presented as production activation.

Target controls exercised in the sandbox service harness
Condition System action Evidence captured Owner role
Identity incomplete No member details retrieved; agent follows the manual verification script. Auth failure code, blocked retrieval event, replay reference. Service operations
Low confidence or source mismatch Suggestion suppressed; knowledge gap routed to backlog. Retrieval results, confidence decision, missing-source ticket. Knowledge owner
PII/PHI policy hit Field masked, redacted, or removed from prompt and CRM summary. Policy decision, redacted fields, model-context record. Privacy and security
CRM writeback exception Manual update task created; final write requires agent confirmation. Failed payload, retry state, manual task, agent signoff. Platform engineering

Keep going

Return to the governed portfolio.

The portfolio lane carries the current status, attention signal, next action, and dependency for every Contact Center AI initiative on the governed register.