ServiceLink Portal
Member service, billing, coverage, documents, secure inbox, payments, and guided support workflows.
- Next proof: member journey map, billing parity, support UAT.
- Evidence: target architecture, requirements baseline, business case.
This is the meeting-ready front door for the WHPS AI transformation. It gives leadership a status picture, tells architects where the target diagrams live, tells delivery teams what is gated, and gives reviewers a controlled evidence path instead of a pile of disconnected documents.
Executive, current work, Wipro/HPS current state, architecture, security, AI SDLC, mainframe, financial, governance, and evidence views exist.
Production content is published to the corporate-facing site; each release still needs smoke evidence after push.
Mega architecture, target platform, network/security, Contact Center AI, AI SDLC, EDE, and migration diagrams.
Named owners, exact dates, endpoint inventory, certificates, SIEM, runtime, AWS discovery outputs, and production telemetry.
The flow starts with the mainframe and COBOL problem, moves through the modern React and cloud-native target, proves delivery with GroupLink and BrokerLink/MarketLink, then anchors speed in the WHPS AI SDLC Factory.
Mainframe, COBOL, DB2, MQ, EDI, file transfer, portals, and manual operating drag.
02 Modern experiencesReact product surfaces for ServiceLink, BrokerLink, GroupLink, and Contact Center AI.
03 GroupLink before/futureFrom old CSR workflow to modern group onboarding, census, billing, renewal, and evidence console.
04 AI SDLC FactoryAgentic delivery with risk tiering, secure gates, human approval, release evidence, and telemetry.
05 Migration wavesDiscovery, dependency mapping, facades, dual run, parity scorecards, cutover, rollback, decommission.
Each tile has a status, the evidence that supports it, and the next decision area for leadership review.
Member service, billing, coverage, documents, secure inbox, payments, and guided support workflows.
Broker/EDE pathway and MarketLink greenfield build lane for secure, modern, audit-facing broker capability.
Group administration, census, billing context, renewal workflows, reports, and delegated operations.
Omnichannel intake, secure RAG, private runtime pattern, human approval, CRM writeback, QA evidence.
Outcome-driven rebuild, targeted legacy discovery, coexistence layer, validation, waves, decommission ledger.
Model-agnostic methodology, scoped teams, gateway controls, secure release gates, evals, evidence vault.
This turns the site from a presentation into an operating system: every executive discussion should end with a decision, owner, evidence requirement, and next checkpoint.
The public site exists; each push should leave a dated smoke record proving the live executive site is current.
Owner: platform / web ops | Evidence: release record, production page checks, rollback pathState that WHPS is building a cloud-native, AI-native platform and using legacy selectively for validation.
Owner: sponsor / architecture | Evidence: target ADR, migration posture, domain mapThe current library is structurally complete, but owner/date accuracy turns it into a controlled packet.
Owner: transformation office | Evidence: RACI, document index, monthly packetDecide runtime boundary, channels in scope, data classes, CRM writeback mode, QA sample, and red-team plan.
Owner: service ops / security | Evidence: PHI SOP, service harness, SIEM eventsThe new Wipro and AWS documents provide sourced facts for HPS zones, ServiceLink, ExchangeLink, DataPower, MQFTE, PaySafe/Fiserv, and the measured mainframe estate.
Owner: architecture / migration office | Evidence: current-state map, AWS baseline, source translationThe baseline exists, but interface, data-store, batch/file, security-zone, and ops maps are the next proof layer.
Owner: migration office | Evidence: discovery backlog, dependency graph, wave intakeThe roadmap is intentionally gate-oriented. The point is not to show activity; it is to show what must be true before leadership can safely scale funding, migration, and AI-enabled operations.
Record production smoke evidence, owners, RACI, artifact IDs, pilot boundary, current-state inventory intake, and board narrative.
Complete interface catalog, target service contracts, security zone map, Contact Center AI pilot evidence, and release packet.
Run migration wave intake, dual-run scorecards, omnichannel service tests, AI SDLC evidence gates, and finance value bridge.
Scale only after architecture, security, QA, operations, finance, and sponsor gates show traceable readiness.
Start with the mega map, then drop into the exact diagram that answers the audience's question. This avoids over-explaining while still having the technical depth ready.
Each reviewer question has a landing page, evidence packet, owner layer, and residual-risk answer.
This is the high-signal preview. The full evidence hub contains the detailed policy/procedure/RACI matrix.
| Type | Item | Impact | Mitigation / evidence | Next owner action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk | Production smoke evidence can lag behind fast content pushes. | Leadership may see an older live page if deploy verification is skipped. | Deployment configuration, production smoke test, rollback runbook. | Record the production page checks and smoke result after every executive-content release. |
| Assumption | Contact Center AI private runtime and SIEM path are target controls, not confirmed production facts. | Security reviewers may ask for exact boundary evidence. | PHI/ePHI SOP, model gateway trace, SIEM correlation, pilot plan. | Validate runtime, logging, certificate, and retention facts. |
| Issue | Current-state baseline exists, but full interface, data-store, batch/file, security-zone, and operations diagrams still need completion. | Cutover confidence remains lower until remaining dependencies are mapped. | Wipro/HPS baseline, discovery backlog, dependency register, data lineage, wave intake. | Collect remaining due-diligence artifacts and map them into to-be views. |
| Dependency | Named RACI owners and controlled document IDs are not final. | Evidence library is persuasive but not yet a controlled governance packet. | RACI, artifact index, monthly evidence packet, approval log. | Assign owners, dates, maturity state, and document numbers. |
Policies, procedures, diagrams, RACI, roadmaps, standards, risk registers, and architecture proof are routed through this control index.
Low-code, pro-code, AI-assisted delivery, review, test, release, evidence gates.
Security Contact Center AI compliance packetPHI/ePHI boundary, secure RAG, red-team, incident, monitoring, audit evidence.
Diagram Diagram answer libraryWhich diagram answers leadership, architecture, security, operations, and consultant questions.
Current work Proof-point demo routeGroupLink modernization, BrokerLink / MarketLink security proof, ServiceLink replication, and staff realignment.
Traceability CMS/EDE requirements matrixRequirement source, Agile backlog, platform function, test kit, FIT case, evidence link, and audit disposition.
Portfolio visibility Agentic delivery operating layerRequirements reconciliation, change intake, Git signals, agent runs, evidence gates, and SprintLoop product direction.
Platforms Built platform showcaseGroupLink, MarketLink, ReconLink, ClaimsLink, supporting platform links, video assets, and prompts.
Architecture Target-state architecture libraryAs-is lanes, to-be roadmap, mega architecture, membership, security, and platform views.
Current state Wipro Links / HPS baselineSource-backed ServiceLink, ExchangeLink, DataPower, MQFTE, PaySafe/Fiserv, DB2, and HPS zone map.
Migration Mainframe migration control modelOutcome-driven rebuild, coexistence, wave factory, dual-run, rollback, decommission.
Finance Value and retirement ledgerInvestment, run-cost reduction, decommission proof, value bridge, funding questions.