Current work and proof points

WHPS already has proof that the future platform can be built safely.

GroupLink Portal and the broker/agent pathway build are the visible proof points for a repeatable AI-native delivery capability: modern user experience, secure full-stack engineering, regulated-data controls, audit evidence, and a path to move ServiceLink Portal and other mainframe-dependent capabilities into the same target architecture.

Business case review and demo cadence

The meeting moves from business rationale into architecture, security, flows, and the application.

The cadence uses the EDE broker portal investment case as input while keeping the discussion focused on strategy, platform evidence, architecture, security, and the live workflow path.

00-04 Strategic context

EDE is positioned as a required broker and consumer operating capability, not a side portal.

04-09 Business case

The why-now thesis connects regulatory shift, broker distribution, retention, growth, and HPS differentiation.

09-18 Architecture and security

Broker/agent pathway security posture, EDE flow, platform controls, evidence model, and architecture diagrams establish the technical foundation.

18-32 Application demo

The MarketLink path runs from broker access through agency control, application, plan shopping, consent, and evidence.

32-40 Operating plan

Certification work, security validation, AI SDLC cadence, migration pattern, owners, and decisions close the discussion.

Initial review

Why HPS moves now

The EDE strategy is a platform move: modern broker enrollment, white-label consumer entry, ServiceLink billing and reconciliation depth, secure evidence capture, and a repeatable modernization pattern for the broader ACA operating platform.

Market pull EDE becomes the broker operating path
HPS advantage Enrollment plus billing, service, reconciliation, and evidence
Build leverage AI SDLC, current platform proof, and controlled security gates
01 Regulatory timing creates a real platform need.

CMS is moving the market toward EDE capabilities, which makes broker enrollment, evidence, auditability, and partner readiness a near-term operating requirement.

02 Broker experience is becoming a competitive front door.

The portal must support agency hierarchy, book-of-business visibility, application status, consent, documents, and service follow-up in one governed workspace.

03 HPS can differentiate beyond enrollment UX.

The stronger story is the connection to billing, reconciliation, service workflows, EDI, compliance evidence, and operational support.

04 Initial investment proves adoption and readiness.

Funding is concentrated on certification gap closure, security hardening, audit evidence, broker workflows, and production readiness before broader monetization.

Demo route

One page to answer: what is underway, what changed, what proves capability, and where the evidence lives.

This is the live status route for AI SDLC, product modernization, security model, and staff realignment proof. These workstreams are the concrete examples.

Proof point 01

GroupLink Portal modernization

Moves group and CSR operations from an antiquated legacy experience toward a modern Group platform.

  • Prior state: legacy PHP-style CSR workflow with dense screens, manual navigation, and green-screen-like operational patterns.
  • Target state: modern group administration, census, renewals, billing context, reporting, and delegated operations.
  • Near-term marker: Christos onboarding is targeted for June 2026 and validated through the release plan.
GroupLink status
Proof point 02

Broker/agent pathway greenfield build

Demonstrates that WHPS can engineer a regulated, secure, modern full-stack platform using the AI SDLC.

  • MarketLink is treated here as the greenfield build lane feeding the regulated broker/agent capability story.
  • Documented controls include TLS termination, SSO/MFA, role-based access, encryption keys, audit logs, and health checks.
  • Independent assessment is planned to begin the week of May 11, 2026, followed by penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, and CMS audit handoff.
Broker/agent pathway status
Replication path

ServiceLink Portal and mainframe exit

Uses GroupLink and the broker/agent pathway as evidence that the same pattern can migrate member service and core domains.

  • Repeatable factory: capability discovery, domain service design, AI SDLC build, target security, audit packet, dual-run, and decommission.
  • Legacy remains evidence context and validation input; it does not define the future architecture.
  • Next proof: ServiceLink member journey, billing parity, secure inbox, coverage lineage, and mainframe retirement ledger.
Replication model
Operating proof

Staff realignment into AI-native teams

Moves the IT model from project-by-project handoffs into product teams with evidence, security, and QA embedded.

  • Roles align to product ownership, platform architecture, secure engineering, QA automation, evidence control, operations, and SME validation.
  • Output is measured by released capabilities, risk reduction, audit readiness, and retired legacy cost.
  • Team structure is tool-agnostic: the process is WHPS AI SDLC Factory governance, not dependency on one vendor tool.
Operating model
Repeatable migration pattern

Use GroupLink and the broker/agent pathway as the playbook for ServiceLink Portal and mainframe modernization.

The answer is not "copy the tool." The answer is "copy the governed method." The platforms may differ, but the operating method, evidence gates, security posture, and decommission logic stay consistent.

01 Discover selectively

Extract interfaces, data stores, batch/file jobs, roles, screens, hidden rules, failure modes, and audit obligations.

02 Design the target domain

Define member, group, broker, coverage, billing, document, payment, notification, and service domains.

03 Build through AI SDLC

Use model-agnostic teams, scoped workspaces, code standards, evals, scans, approvals, and release packets.

04 Validate with evidence

Run automated tests, security scans, red-team replays, parity checks, UAT, audit samples, and pilot telemetry.

05 Coexist safely

Use facade APIs, event bridges, reconciliation, manual override, rollback, and operations runbooks during transition.

06 Retire what is replaced

Only count transformation value after retired jobs, screens, licenses, integrations, and run costs are evidenced.

AI-native operating model

Staff realignment shifts work from legacy task handling to product, platform, security, and evidence roles.

This is how leadership can explain the workforce story without making it tool-specific: people move closer to product outcomes, controls, reusable platform services, QA automation, operations, and regulated evidence.

Product

Portal product owners

Own ServiceLink Portal, broker/agent pathways, GroupLink Portal, and Contact Center AI outcomes, roadmaps, acceptance criteria, and business readiness.

Architecture

Domain and platform architects

Own target architecture, domain-service boundaries, integration patterns, security zones, technical debt, and ADRs.

Engineering

AI SDLC delivery teams

Build through controlled scoped workspaces, coding standards, code review, tests, secure release gates, and deployment evidence.

Security

Security and compliance embedded reviewers

Own threat modeling, PHI/PII controls, SSO/MFA posture, scan disposition, audit artifacts, POA&M, and exception management.

Quality

QA automation and evidence control

Own regression, service tests, parity scorecards, AI evals, UAT, traceability, and monthly evidence packets.

Operations

SRE and transition operations

Own monitoring, incident response, runbooks, backup/DR, certificate rotation, rollout controls, rollback, and decommission proof.

Dedicated meeting paths

Dedicated routes connect each discussion topic to the answer surface.

These routes keep the discussion coordinated across product details, AI SDLC methodology, security controls, staff realignment, and migration proof.